Should Amazon Be Responsible For The Accident of Third-Party Sellers: Netease Technology News April 28, according to foreign media reports, last year, a battery sold by third-party sellers to customers through the Amazon platform triggered a garage fire. The insurance company involved filed a lawsuit against Amazon, saying it should be responsible for the $ 75,000 damage caused by the fire.
It is reported that in April last year, Amazon delivered a battery sold by a third-party seller to Dane Meyer of Catonwood, Minnesota. As a result, this mislabeled battery caused a fire while charging in the garage. Must Read: Google Parent Company’s Q1 Net Profit Increased by 3% Year-on-Year to US $ 6.8 billion, after-hours stock price rose 8%
Should Amazon Be Responsible For The Accident of Third-Party Sellers
The insurance company involved in the case, Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Company, said that the battery meets Amazon’s Prime member shipping conditions and is listed as an “Amazon Select” product. The insurance company said in the complaint: “‘Amazon Select’ products are products recommended on the Amazon platform with high ratings and reasonable prices, which can be shipped immediately.”
The complaint alleges that the battery caught fire when used with an incompatible charger. In the product listing information on the Amazon website, this type of charger is listed as “compatible”.
Should Amazon Be Responsible For The Accident of Third-Party Sellers: The insurance company filed a lawsuit on the grounds of negligence, failure to give warnings, and the need to bear liability, saying that Amazon “played a direct role in the promotion, sales, distribution, and delivery of batteries. The insurance company said the battery was delivered to Meyer in a box with the Amazon logo.
This lawsuit is the latest test of how much responsibility Amazon
Should Amazon Be Responsible For The Accident of Third-Party Sellers: This lawsuit is the latest test of how much responsibility Amazon has to bear on third-party seller products sold on its platform. In the past, Amazon has always insisted that for certain products, it is only a channel between buyers and sellers, so there is no need to be responsible for the defects of these products. Must Read: Nokia Wins 1 Billion Dollars Network Equipment Order From India’s Third Largest Operator
In July 2019, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled with a 2 to 1 result that Amazon is responsible for the products of third-party suppliers. The case was a lawsuit filed by a woman in Pennsylvania who claimed that the dog collar she bought from Amazon suddenly broke and hit her face causing blindness in one eye.
According to the majority opinion of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, “We believe that Pennsylvania law cannot be exempted from strict liability simply because a company follows a business model that fails to prioritize consumer safety.”